Vulpes Libris

A collective of bibliophiles talking about books. Book Fox (vulpes libris): small bibliovorous mammal of overactive imagination and uncommonly large bookshop expenses. Habitat: anywhere the rustle of pages can be heard.

A is for Arsenic. The Poisons of Agatha Christie

arsenicIt’s astonishing that this book had not been written before. It’s a study of the poisons deployed by Agatha Christie in a selection of her novels, written by a toxicologist and a passionate fan of the Christie oeuvre. The most delightful thing to find out from this book was that Christie knew her stuff, had trained as a pharmacist, and was scrupulously accurate. Thus all the poisons used in her plots worked exactly as they should have done in real life, which adds the indefinable something that makes her plots so addictive. Her novels really only exist to test the reader’s detection levels against the those of the characters, so the crucial details of how murder was achieved have to be absolutely accurate.

Harkup uses an alphabetical approach, which avoids having to proclaim which is the most important or the least effective of the poisons: all are specially deadly in their own ways. She tackles (deep breath) arsenic, belladonna, cyanide, digitalis, eserine, hemlock, monkshood, nicotine, opium, phosphorus, ricin, strychnine, thallium and veronal, by way of a thorough chemical analysis to get your brain working, then some history of science, some famous real-life cases, which of those Christie might have been influenced by and then How She Did It.

Some of the poisons have additional sections on how Christie’s description of symptoms and methods had (happily and unhappily) influenced those who came after her. It is very pleasing to read that several lives have been saved because someone (once even a nurse) had read the right Christie novel with the very same symptoms presented in a real life case. In at least one other case one of her novels was produced as evidence for the prosecution in a murder trial.

The range of skills and interests demanded of the reader is quite challenging. I did find the chemistry and molecular analysis at first-year university level (which I have done) to be a bit of a stretch, whereas the plot précis are sometimes plodding. The editing could also have been better: there is quite a bit of repetition between chapters, as if some had been written months apart but still said the same things about the poison or plot.

Aside from that, this book gives an emphatic impression of how murderous the human race is, especially those living in the UK. (Britain’s inheritance laws, unlike, say, those in Belgium, are peculiarly conducive to murdering one’s relatives.) It also reveals the extraordinary bravery of generations of toxicologists who tested their hypotheses on themselves. But the longest-lasting effect is to make you rush back to Christie’s novels, even those you thought you knew well, to spot the telling symptoms.

Kathryn Harkup, A Is For Arsenic. The Poisons of Agatha Christie (Bloomsbury 2015), ISBN 978-1-4729-1132-2, £9.99, $17.00, €14.99

Kate is now a publisher as well as a book blogger: 

About Kate

Writer, reviewer, literary historian and publisher at Also a Bath Quaker.

3 comments on “A is for Arsenic. The Poisons of Agatha Christie

  1. cleopatralovesbooks
    September 6, 2017

    I thought this was an amazing book. It reminded me of some of Agatha Christie’s books that I want to reread and had superb information about the poisons she used in the books.

  2. Pingback: Now posting on Vulpes Libris: A is for Arsenic – Kate Macdonald

  3. noelleg44
    October 2, 2017

    This is a great book. I bought it the moment I spied it, and used one of the poisons in my fourth book, out soon. Thanks, Agatha, and thanks Kathryn Harkup!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s



Editorial Policy

The views expressed in the articles and reviews on Vulpes Libris are those of the authors, and not of Vulpes Libris itself.

Quoting from Vulpes Libris

You are very welcome to quote up to 100 words from any article posted on Vulpes Libris - as long as you quote accurately, give us due credit and link back to the original post. If you would like to quote MORE than 100 words, please ask us first via the email address in the Contact details.


  • (The header image is from Aesop's Fables, illustrated by Francis Barlow (1666), and appears courtesy of the Digital and Multimedia Center at the Michigan State University Libraries.)
  • %d bloggers like this: