Vulpes Libris

A collective of bibliophiles talking about books. Book Fox (vulpes libris): small bibliovorous mammal of overactive imagination and uncommonly large bookshop expenses. Habitat: anywhere the rustle of pages can be heard.

English Eccentrics by Edith Sitwell


Reviewed by Diana Birchall.

Diana recently retired from the movie business, where she was a story analyst at Warner Bros, reading novels to see if they’d make movies. This was a dream job because she got paid for reading, and was able to work at home all night and sleep all day, as was her wont. Along the way she wrote a few books of her own, a biography of her grandmother the first Asian American novelist (though Diana is New York Jewish and actually only one-eighth Chinese but never mind), and several Jane Austen sequels. Jane Austen was her natural refuge and solace from a life spent plowing through eight hundred page manuscripts about robots, dragons, dwarves, Mafiosi, and bombs. Now having said goodbye to all that, she contemplates her massive To Be Read stockpile with a mixture of liberation and dread. She lives in California with poet husband, librarian son, and three mercifully illiterate cats.


Having recently retired, I’ve come smack up against the reality of what happens if you steadily buy books through all the decades of your employment, telling yourself “I’ll read them when I retire.” In such a case, your TBR pile, when finally faced, is a veritable Great Wall, chinked with dust so no light shines through. Nothing daunted (and at least a dozen new additions came from last autumn’s visit to Daunt Books in London), I reached in, and plucked one with an enchanting title: English Eccentrics by Edith Sitwell. That seemed promising because I’d never read a book by a Sitwell, but knew they were colorful literary types who might be amusing to dally with. (Disclaimer: although I fancied myself thoroughly au fait with Vulpes Libris, I somehow missed Simon’s sojourn at Renishaw Hall, and apologize for what may be a Surfeit of Sitwells…though with Bloomsbury and Mitfordland seemingly inexhaustible, why not Renishaw?)

English Eccentrics is a compendium of English oddities, an intrinsically eccentric volume in itself, written in a densely packed, rococo style, laced with dark sardonic wit. Unquestionably stuffed with fascinating historical curiosities, anecdotes, and snippets, it is like an extremely clever anchovy: a small taste goes a long way. I would read one, two, a few weird bits described with ornateness and affectation, and then feel like throwing the book against the wall like an incessantly chirping insect. My reactions varied from “I can’t read any more of this” to, “Hang on, look at the next section. Hermits. Quacks – may come from the Coptic quok, hmm … never knew that. Alchemists. Man buried upside down. Hunter who hated horses and rode to hounds on a bull. Whatever next?” etc, etc …

I was just starting to get rather tired of what seemed like an overwritten freak show, when I came to the “Portrait of a Learned Lady” chapter, in which the life of Margaret Fuller is offered as an extended joke. Sitwell describes Fuller as an absurd creature influenced by “the trousered emancipated women like George Sand” who were “collected with great eagerness by sex-snobs.” Sitwell infectiously invites us to laugh at the delicious spectacle of Mrs. Emerson begging the lugubrious Margaret to tutor Emerson and Carlyle on the sense of humour they so lacked. (Carlyle was a particularly difficult subject as he insisted on talking without interruption and never let Margaret speak.) The learned lady is balanced by the next chapter on men of learning, in which Herbert Spencer is seen traveling in a hammock slung in a train, his manuscript tied around his waist with string.

The section on travelers is dominated by the exotic imposter Princess Cariboo, whom the exiled Napoleon wanted to marry; and this anecdote is followed by one about a fake cannibal chief. I learned about a great many things, an unknown number of them apocryphal, such as the octogenarian squire who tried to fly, bathed his owls, and affectionately adopted a sloth in South America; and the Countess of Desmond who died at 140 falling from an apple tree.

This indigestible yet exasperatingly fascinating tome (which may I say is ideally suited for intellectual bathroom reading), left me with a certain curiosity about the mind that compiled, or concocted, it all. Edith’s memoir Taken Care Of is more connectedly written than English Eccentrics, and very sad indeed. Rejected by her parents (“I was unpopular with my parents from the moment of my birth” she writes) Edith painfully recounts how her mother, a beauty, had no use for the ugly child, and her father forced her to wear a metal “Bastille” to straighten her spine. As a young women, when her parents were embroiled in bankruptcies and scandals, she left the family home to live in near poverty in a small flat in London with her old governess. Edith’s serious avocation was always as a poet, but she seems to have had an equal talent for knowing all the great literary figures of her day, particularly being drawn to the artist Pavel Tchelitchew and poet Dylan Thomas. Her talents were then highly rated, as were those of her two younger brothers Osbert and Sasheverell, and they formed a colorful trio whose publicity tours were only too fiendishly successful. Tiring of these, Edith noted, “Began to operate as a team, came to regret it, felt like an Indian god with 3 sets of legs & arms.”

She does not seem to have much enjoyed her eccentric fame, claiming to feel like “an unpopular electric eel in a pool of catfish.” Osbert’s biographer Philip Ziegler calls the Sitwells early exponents of the “famous for being famous” school, and this fame seems to have collapsed like a bubble, for nowadays their writing and their legend are all but forgotten. Nothing if not original, with a strong display of the rhythm of words, Edith Sitwell’s most famous book nevertheless struck me as equally exhausting and exasperating as entertaining. In truth, what I enjoyed most in this Sitwellian immersion was a mesmerizing YouTube interview with an Edith aged, tragic, a masklike fantastically garbed grotesque, yet clearly innately humane and kind. Still, I may be forgiven for hoping for something more ordinary and orderly from my next foray in the TBR pile …


8 comments on “English Eccentrics by Edith Sitwell

  1. Ken Hoyt
    May 6, 2016

    Really fun read of a review, and if you can tell me how to get a job reading books for adapting into movies I can send you my CV…. !🙂

  2. Nancy Vermette
    May 6, 2016

    Steady on, Diana! Great review. Keep working through that mountain of TBR!

  3. Jackie
    May 8, 2016

    Hmmm, I feel sorry for Ms. Sitwell, it sounds like she was unfulfilled with her strange, but interesting life, though I realize that her younger years were sad. Her memoir might be interesting, though you have me worried about her style of writing.
    This was an entertaining debut. Welcome to VL, Ms. Birchall!

  4. Diana Birchall
    May 8, 2016

    Ken, unfortunately those jobs have dried up drastically over the last decade or so…the technological changes in the movie business, and the way things are farmed out at the least expense, so assistants are having to read scripts for no extra pay. It’s not really a possible profession anymore, very different from when I started. Sad to say.


  5. Diana Birchall
    May 8, 2016

    Thanks,Nancy! I’m only one book down the mountain…

  6. Diana Birchall
    May 8, 2016

    Jackie, I’m sure she had a lot of sadness in her life…and her writing style isn’t the most congenial, though interesting. I have long admired the Foxes and am really thrilled to have a piece here! Thanks!

  7. Kate
    May 8, 2016

    This was a very nice reminder: I think I gobbled this book whole as a teenager, and have been very keen on Edith Sitwelliana ever since. I felt so sorry for her disastrous relationships, she didn’t have a female friend to advise or sympathise with her, as far as I could tell, and lunged from one hopeless mess to another. Her book on Elizabeth 1 and Mary Q of Scots is very good indeed. But her poetry is now what she’s definitely not forgotten for: regularly anthologised, and taught as a model of how to use assonance and consonance and their tricky siblings. She was a technical poet par excellence, and a very wise voice, for all her personal unwisdom.

  8. camilledefleurville
    May 9, 2016

    Wonderful entry in Vulpes Libris reviewers, Diana, and you may know that I do not shower compliments – quite the contrary! I really enjoy what you have written and shall reread the review.
    Perhaps it helps that I know you and I know the book as well as the Sitwells. I read the book small bit by small bits: I could not have swallowed it in gulps. Not the easiest one to start reading your TBR stack(s) but definitely a very good one – and a classic.
    Merci et bravo!🙂

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


This entry was posted on May 6, 2016 by in Fiction, Guest, Non-fiction, Non-fiction: biography, Poetry and tagged , , .



Editorial Policy

The views expressed in the articles and reviews on Vulpes Libris are those of the authors, and not of Vulpes Libris itself.

Quoting from Vulpes Libris

You are very welcome to quote up to 100 words from any article posted on Vulpes Libris - as long as you quote accurately, give us due credit and link back to the original post. If you would like to quote MORE than 100 words, please ask us first via the email address in the Contact details.


  • (The header image is from Aesop's Fables, illustrated by Francis Barlow (1666), and appears courtesy of the Digital and Multimedia Center at the Michigan State University Libraries.)
  • %d bloggers like this: