Vulpes Libris

A collective of bibliophiles talking about books. Book Fox (vulpes libris): small bibliovorous mammal of overactive imagination and uncommonly large bookshop expenses. Habitat: anywhere the rustle of pages can be heard.

Faith, Seriously: The Ethics of Everyday Life, by Michael Banner

bannerLike much of the really exciting theology I’ve read this year (Rowan Williams’ Meeting God in Mark, or Hugh Gilbert OSB’s The Tale of Quisquis), The Ethics of Everyday Life is not a monograph, but a collection. In 2013, the theologian and ethicist Michael Banner gave the Oxford University Bampton Lectures, in which he argued that, when it comes to the low-key decision-making of day-to-day life, Christian ethics as it stands is simply not fit for purpose. These lectures represent a first attempt by Banner at constructing a new sort of ethics informed by social anthropology and centred on the life of Christ, and they are reproduced here more or less as is, with a neat but unobtrusive critical framework.

Lecture transcripts are often less accessible to the general reader simply because those who turn up to hear them in the first place can reasonably be assumed to have a certain knowledge of the field, and a certain investment in it. This is true here, although Banner is an excellent communicator; readers without at least a basic grasp of Christian ethics and its preoccupations might best start with his Christian Ethics: A Brief History. But for those who do have that grasp or are prepared to acquire it, this is an extremely rewarding read.

The lecture series form – essentially, a set of short exercises on a common theme – is perfectly suited to that first assault on a new (or renewed) methodology: it leaves plenty of space for unanswered (or unanswerable) questions, loose ends, ambiguities. And Banner has deliberately chosen to concentrate, not on “hard case” scenarios such as euthanasia, but on messy and open-ended things like kinship, age, infirmity, memory: everyday and universal things which are at best badly served by the predominant obsession with Big Decisions and either/or choices.

He carries it off, too. The tone is conversational and sometimes wonderfully dry, but never facile; it entirely avoids the faux chattiness of so much self-consciously accessible academic work. Banner is frank about the limitations of the exercise and the lacunae in his reading, especially of social anthropology, and this only gives his (initial) conclusions more authority. And, however provisional it may be, his ethical schema hangs together convincingly and well, and there is much with which to engage whether you agree with it or not. Only occasionally is there any sense of unfinished thinking: it seems odd, for example, to speak about the supposed medicalisation of childbirth without mentioning the risk of maternal mortality, which crops up only in the following section and under another heading entirely. But these infrequent moments do not undermine the excellence of the whole, or its potential as a new and exciting way of doing theology.

So much for my (theologically minded, Christian) perspective. When reviewing a book about religion, there is always the implicit question: but do you have to be religious to read it? That’s pretty straightforward when it comes to an academic monograph like Christian Ethics: A Brief History (the answer is “no”, for the record). Here it’s a little more complicated. The Bampton Lectures have a long history as a forum for spirited theological debate among Christians; they matter to people because the questions they raise, while of academic and cultural interest, are also material ones for the life of the church. In this particular case, I’d say it’s not necessary to buy in to the Christ-centred ethos Banner advocates; the motivation for reading might be as simple as knowing one’s enemy. The real bottom line is being prepared to take the faith of others seriously; to accord a place of some kind to religious feeling and religious practice, however alien, in the grand scheme of legitimate human experience. That is really the primary thrust of this book, and it ought to involve and to trouble readers of any faith or none.

Oxford University Press, hardback, 240 pp., ISBN: 978-0-19-872206-9. Also available as an e-book.

Kirsty Jane McCluskey writes about history, literature and theology. She is a regular book reviewer for The Tablet. She also collects Jesuit vocation stories over at Project SJ.

3 comments on “Faith, Seriously: The Ethics of Everyday Life, by Michael Banner

  1. kirstyjane
    December 19, 2014

    Reblogged this on Kirsty Jane McCluskey and commented:

    Approaching Michael Banner’s new approach to Christian ethics on VL today.

  2. Jackie
    December 26, 2014

    This sounds interesting and I like the idea that it concentrates on the everyday practice of ethics, instead of the Big Picture issues. It’s the ordinary questions and behaviors that we most often encounter and struggle with, yet these are often overlooked in many religious writings. It’s good to know that some theological pieces deal with them. Thanks for highlighting this book, it sounds very worthwhile.

  3. kirstyjane
    December 30, 2014

    It is, Jackie — I think you’d enjoy it!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s



Editorial Policy

The views expressed in the articles and reviews on Vulpes Libris are those of the authors, and not of Vulpes Libris itself.

Quoting from Vulpes Libris

You are very welcome to quote up to 100 words from any article posted on Vulpes Libris - as long as you quote accurately, give us due credit and link back to the original post. If you would like to quote MORE than 100 words, please ask us first via the email address in the Contact details.


  • (The header image is from Aesop's Fables, illustrated by Francis Barlow (1666), and appears courtesy of the Digital and Multimedia Center at the Michigan State University Libraries.)
  • %d bloggers like this: