Vulpes Libris

A collective of bibliophiles talking about books. Book Fox (vulpes libris): small bibliovorous mammal of overactive imagination and uncommonly large bookshop expenses. Habitat: anywhere the rustle of pages can be heard.

Red Pottage by Mary Cholmondeley

Red PottageUntil I did an MA in Victorian Studies a few years ago, I had never heard of Mary Cholmondeley. Then, when looking into late 19th century writers who dealt with feminism and/or women’s inequality, this name kept popping up, along with that of her best known novel Red Pottage. It sounded like something I should be taking a look at, so I tracked down a secondhand copy of the Virago edition.

The story has several strands, as is the way with most Victorian novels, but there are two major ones. Firstly, Hugh Scarlett has been having a caddish affair with Lady Newhaven and believes he’s got away with it. He’s bored with her, though, and he decides to end it. But before he can do it, he is taken to one side by Lord Newhaven who, we discover, has known about the affair all along, and is – understandably – not best pleased. He challenges Scarlett to draw lighters with him, and whoever gets the short one has five months to kill himself. I shant say here who draws the short lighter, but needless to say there’s a lot of intrigue and suspicion flying around as to who it is, not least in the mind of Lady Newhaven who has been listening at the door while this has been going on, but doesn’t hear who pulls the unlucky lighter.

The novel’s other strand concerns Hester Gresham, who has written a successful novel about the poverty-stricken East End of London, much of her information having come from her best friend Rachel. Rachel had lived in poverty before coming into a massive inheritance. Hester, meanwhile, has never married and never had children – her novels are her children – so when the aunt she lives with dies she has to go and live with her brother and his family. The Rev Gresham – the brother – is super-devout and spends much of his time writing excruciatingly worthy religious tracts denouncing Dissenters (whether they are atheists or just Christians of a different denomination) as “worms”. He disapproves of his quiet, intense, city-reared sister, and thinks she is flighty and not nearly godly enough. He is particularly frustrated by her non-attendance at early morning church services.

The two threads inevitably connect up. Hugh sees Rachel at a party and falls in love with her; the Newhavens have a country house near the Gresham vicarage. But along the way there is death and affairs and lying and novel-burning. It may be a bit of a pot boiler, but it one that actually says a great deal about a woman (Hester) who eschews the classic Victorian ideals of “femininity”. She doesn’t want children because she can only love her writing and her burgeoning career as a writer. She does not write because she needs the money (which was just about acceptable to Victorian society), she writes because it is in her bones, she can’t not write, and those are qualities that tended to be seen as distinctly un-feminine. Women are meant to stay at home and run a house and a family – any woman that deviated from that is simply improper.

There are also discussions about marrying for love versus marrying someone “appropriately”. There is a wonderful and occasionally funny critique of the clergy (note, the clergy is what is attacked here, not religion, which the author clearly embraces – Hester is most certainly a spiritual person, just not in a regimented, organised religion way), and it explores pertinent ideas about women being free to get out of an unhappy marriage without scandal. Red Pottage may not now be remembered as well as some of its contemporaries, but it’s worth reading if the plight of women in the 19th century is your thing.

NB. This is a revised and edited version of a blog post that originally appeared on an old blog of mine several years ago. That blog no longer exists, and having found this post floating around my computer, I wanted to preserve it. It’s also reminded me that I really want to re-read Red Pottage…

My edition of Red Pottage is a Virago from the 1980s, and the novel is now out of print. However, various secondhand and electronic copies are available online.

6 comments on “Red Pottage by Mary Cholmondeley

  1. Kate
    May 14, 2014

    Reading Red Pottage made me want to throw the book across the room and scream with frustration. There is so much anger in it, so much repressed fury at the rules and the conventions of the later 19thC. The book-burning scene is particularly gruelling; And, obviously, it is a brilliantly written book to drive all that out.

  2. Kirsty D
    May 14, 2014

    I totally agree, Kate, and the more I’ve thought about this book again over the last couple of days, the more I remember how much emotion it evoked. It seems such a shame that it isn’t better known, but I think it’s a marvellous book.

  3. Catherine Pope
    May 14, 2014

    Great review, Kirsty! I thoroughly recommend Carolyn Oulton’s biography of Mary Cholmondeley, ‘Let the Flowers Go’. Unfortunately, it’s very expensive – a terrible shame, as it deserves to be more widely read.

  4. Kirsty D
    May 14, 2014

    Thanks Catherine! I’m aware of Carolyn’s Oulton’s biography, although haven’t (yet!) got around to getting hold of a copy.

  5. Andrea
    May 14, 2014

    I quickly went into my reader’s shop feature and found a lot of copies…warning: don’t get the Google OCR of this book. There is an Internet Archive version as well (both are in the NOOK shop) Why Google would release that mess is beyond

  6. Carol S
    May 14, 2014

    Hurray, I hope: it’s free on kindle. I’m fascinated by this review as it’s the first I’ve heard of the novel. Don’t know how That happened but I’ll remedy it asap. 3rd or 4th on my TBR mountain. Book group book is first (Longbourn by the excellent jo Baker).

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s



Editorial Policy

The views expressed in the articles and reviews on Vulpes Libris are those of the authors, and not of Vulpes Libris itself.

Quoting from Vulpes Libris

You are very welcome to quote up to 100 words from any article posted on Vulpes Libris - as long as you quote accurately, give us due credit and link back to the original post. If you would like to quote MORE than 100 words, please ask us first via the email address in the Contact details.


  • (The header image is from Aesop's Fables, illustrated by Francis Barlow (1666), and appears courtesy of the Digital and Multimedia Center at the Michigan State University Libraries.)
  • %d bloggers like this: