Vulpes Libris

A collective of bibliophiles talking about books. Book Fox (vulpes libris): small bibliovorous mammal of overactive imagination and uncommonly large bookshop expenses. Habitat: anywhere the rustle of pages can be heard.

Monsters of Men by Patrick Ness

“War,” says Mayor Prentiss, his eyes glinting. “At last.”

So begins Monsters of Men, the final volume in Patrick Ness’s multi-award-winning Chaos Walking trilogy. Lines have been drawn, armies are marching; divisive and polarising leaders have got what they wanted. And Todd and Viola are caught in the middle of it, faced with ominous odds and unenviable choices. The first of these is to split up, with Todd staying behind to keep an eye on the Mayor and fight the invading Spackle army while Viola goes in search of the scout ship that has just landed. Once again, their trust in each other will be tested to its absolute limit.

Given that its title stems from the warning delivered by various characters throughout the series – “war makes monsters of men” – it is no surprise that war is the predominant theme and, for better or worse, shapes everything that takes place. Yet Monsters of Men is as complex and multifarious as war itself, an investigation into the many ways and many ends for which people are drawn into it. It is an enthralling culmination to the finest series I’ve read in many years. Chaos Walking combines first rate characterisation with heart-stoppingly exciting plots and engaging, direct, and often lyrical prose. I run out of superlatives when describing just how good it is.

Best of all it challenges the reader. You cannot sit back and watch passively as events unfold. At every turn you are placed in the characters’ shoes, confronted with the question: what would you do? What would you do if your greatest enemy were the only person who could save you from a marauding army bent on revenge? What would you do if your “one in particular” were about to die and the only way you could save them were to fire a missile that would kill hundreds, if not thousands, of enemy soldiers and destroy all hopes of a desperately wished for peace. Faced with the choice between vengeance and forgiveness what would you do? What space is there for idealism when your very survival is driven by a need for realpolitik?

Every choice is played through to its conclusion, laying clear the full ramifications of that choice, the characters forced to live with and adapt to the world they have shaped.  Reading is a dynamic experience; different fonts for the different narrators bring the text alive, Noise sometimes squeezing, sometimes ramming its way onto the page. Characters feel alive because their choices are your own and because they are each three- dimensional, capable of a whole gamut of actions and reactions, none of which are black or white. Ness seems to instinctively appreciate that it is in contradiction and hypocrisy that life is lived and experienced. Uncomfortable truths demonstrating just how difficult some choices are:

“Come!” he says to me. “See what it’s like to be on the winning side.”
And he rides off after the new soldiers.
I ride after him, gun up, but not shooting, just watching and feeling-
Feeling the thrill of it
Cuz that’s it-
That’s the nasty, nasty secret of war-
When yer winning-
When yer winning, it’s ruddy thrilling-

Or how about this, a realisation that love might be the most destructive possibility of all:

“I’d have done the same, Viola,” Todd says, one more time.
And I know he’s saying nothing but the truth.
But as he hugs me again before I leave, I can’t help but think it over and over.
If this is what Todd and I would do for each other, does that make us right?
Or does it make us dangerous?

Monsters of Men combines gripping storylines with real moral quandaries. In Todd and Viola it has heroes you root for with every ounce of your being. They are far from perfect and it is their self-abasement, their doubt, which makes them so likable. And the point that Todd and many other characters come back to time and again is that it’s not how you fall, but how you get back up again that counts.

Contrarily it is the absolute certainty of Mayor Prentiss and Mistress Coyle that makes them so hideous. Their bloodthirsty eagerness for war only adds to this, as does their calm and rational defence of its transformative nature, the Nietzschean survival of the fittest test by which you walk into the fire and either emerge bigger and stronger, or fall away. War doesn’t make monsters of men, Mayor Prentiss and Mistress Coyle chillingly echo each other early on. “It’s war that makes us men in the first place.”

Yet whereas The Knife of Never Letting Go and The Ask and The Answer had, at their heart, a message that power is the ultimate end, Monsters of Men begins to reveal the inherent flaws in that argument. Madness is often defined as continuing to do the same thing time and time again yet expecting different results, and the longer the book goes on, the more those who seek to divide and rule appear ridiculous. Stuck using the same tactics as before, without recognising the new opportunities that exist.

Underlying their military struggle is another battle – this one an ideological struggle between competing visions of how peace is won (discussion versus force, individuality versus collectivism) – and they are losing it.

What would life be like if you could hear everybody’s thoughts, and everybody could hear yours? What would be the effect on individuality, free thought, privacy? These are the questions Ness posed in The Knife of Never Letting Go. In The Ask and The Answer the question evolved into competing ideas of how to run such a society. In Monsters of Men, the circle is completed and the benefits of Noise presented. What if communication were organic rather than active, a natural inter-connectedness that provided community to all and bred trust and unity rather than secrets and lies? How much more intimate might relationships be if miscommunication were no longer possible?

“I think it could be the way forward for all of us,”…If we can all learn to speak this way, then there won’t be any more division… That’s the secret of this planet, Todd. Communication, real and open, so we can finally understand each other.

Warmth, love, and hope abound. As the book goes on these choices begin to congeal around a coherent moral stance, a single call to arms: be the change you want in the world. No matter how hard that might be.

“I’m sorry, Bradley,” I say. “I couldn’t have done any other thing.”
He looks up sharply. “Yes, you could have.” He pulls himself to his feet and says it again, more firmly. “Yes, you could have. Choices may be unbelievably hard but they’re never impossible.”
“What if it’d been Simone down there instead of Todd?” I say.
And Simone is all over his Noise, his deep feelings for her, feelings I don’t think are returned. “You’re right,” He says. “I don’t know. I hope I’d make the right choice, but Viola it is a choice. To say you have no choice is to release yourself from responsibility and that’s not how a person with integrity acts.”

With a host of new characters – including an angry third narrator bent on revenge – who provide fresh impetus and perspective, Monsters of Men is a fitting conclusion full of all the qualities and insight that made its predecessors so rewarding. As you’d expect from a final volume, loose ends are tied up, though not at the expense of the narrative flow, and plenty remains unanswered. Most notably of all, Ness integrates the vast and powerful themes into the plot so seamlessly that they appear effortless. This is a rare and remarkable achievement. Monsters of Men is a near perfect conclusion to a near perfect trilogy.

Walker Books, May 2010, 9781406310271, 624pp

14 comments on “Monsters of Men by Patrick Ness

  1. Clover
    April 28, 2010

    Ooh. I really cannot wait to read this. It’s been such a brilliant series of books so far!

  2. Nikki
    April 28, 2010

    I’d never heard of this trilogy before. I love what you can discover on VL! This sounds like a great set of books. Have you reviewed the previous ones and I’ve just missed them?

  3. Sam Ruddock
    April 29, 2010

    I hope you enjoy it, Clover. I think it’s just as good as the other two.

    Nikki, they are AMAZING! You can see the other two reviews here:
    The Knife of Never Letting Go: https://vulpeslibris.wordpress.com/2009/09/02/the-knife-of-never-letting-go-by-patrick-ness/

    The Ask and The Answer: https://vulpeslibris.wordpress.com/2010/01/06/the-ask-and-the-answer-by-patrick-ness/

  4. Jackie
    May 1, 2010

    Wow, what a vivid review! This sounds like a philosophy book as much as a thriller. It must be a very intense reading experience from your description & I’m glad that the trilogy didn’t get weaker as it went along, which is so often the case with sequels. I don’t read much sci-fi, but your reviews of this series makes me tempted to try it.
    Thank heavens we can’t hear each others thoughts! I don’t want anyone knowing what I’m thinking, though it’s undoubtably more pedestrian than most people. But still…

  5. SamRuddock
    May 2, 2010

    That was what was so interesting about this final volume, Jackie. While the other two had been all about how awful it must be to have your every thought and feeling broadcast to the world, Monsters of Men presented a compelling cast for why it might actually be a good thing. Take, for instance, someone like me. I’m not great when it comes to verbally communicating what I’m thinking and feeling and that often casuses people to doubt me or think I’m less trustworthy than I am. But what is interesting about Noise is that it doesn’t just reflect what you are thinking word for word, but conveys the underlying moods and intentions as well, often through colour. The result of that is that people seem to understand each other better, trust each other more intensely, and therefore get along better. The book links it to an upsurge in community and collectivism, peace and harmony.

    I doubt very much it would be fool-proof, but from a personal perspective it is pretty compelling.

  6. Pingback: Susan Hated Literature | Monster of men

  7. Pingback: Monsters of Men (YA/Adult) | Lover of Ebooks

  8. Pingback: Books About Monsters of Men (YA/Adult) Books About

  9. Suzy
    August 14, 2010

    This series is amazing! I recommend it to anyone! Read them, they’re a must.

  10. genevieve
    January 14, 2011

    Best Books i’v ever read!!!!!!!

    if you haven’t read the series yet what are you doing GET TO IT !!! :D

  11. Julia
    February 1, 2011

    Hey Sam :) great review! I recently finished this series, and it made me wonder why I didn’t start it earlier! The ending tore me apart, and the storyline was more intense than I would’ve liked, but then again that’s why I loved it, the ideas and storyline are so different to anything I’ve read. I recommend this series to ANYONE, it is a must read!

  12. Sam Ruddock
    February 1, 2011

    Thanks Julia. I agree wholeheartedly wither everything you say. Just wish there were going to be more of them!

  13. Pingback: Patrick Ness – Monsters of Men « Fyrefly's Book Blog

  14. Pingback: Monsters of Men by Patrick Ness | Iris on Books

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Categories

Archive

Editorial Policy

The views expressed in the articles and reviews on Vulpes Libris are those of the authors, and not of Vulpes Libris itself.

Quoting from Vulpes Libris

You are very welcome to quote up to 100 words from any article posted on Vulpes Libris - as long as you quote accurately, give us due credit and link back to the original post. If you would like to quote MORE than 100 words, please ask us first via the email address in the Contact details.

Acknowledgment

  • (The header image is from Aesop's Fables, illustrated by Francis Barlow (1666), and appears courtesy of the Digital and Multimedia Center at the Michigan State University Libraries.)
  • Follow

    Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

    Join 811 other followers

    %d bloggers like this: