Vulpes Libris

A collective of bibliophiles talking about books. Book Fox (vulpes libris): small bibliovorous mammal of overactive imagination and uncommonly large bookshop expenses. Habitat: anywhere the rustle of pages can be heard.

Too Close to Home by Linwood Barclay: when Neighbourhood Watch goes terribly, terribly wrong …

When the Cutter family’s next-door neighbours, the Langleys, are gunned down in their house one hot July night, the Cutters’ safe, predictable existence is instantly shattered. For violent death to have come so close to them is as shocking as it is inexplicable. The Langleys were an ordinary suburban family. If they could be the victims of an act of random brutality, then surely nobody’s safe. But although he feels guilty for thinking it, Jim Cutter can take one positive from the tragedy: if the Langleys were just in the wrong place at the wrong time, then at least lightning is unlikely to strike twice in the same spot. Unless, of course, the killers went to the wrong house …

My, but I do love Linwood Barclay’s work. His previous novel, No Time for Goodbye, was a thrilling and very emotional ride, and this new book is really just as good. He’s one of the rare auto-buys on my list. Although, perhaps Too Close to Home has less emotion and more compensatory wit than his previous novel.

That didn’t worry me. Occasionally I can do with some wit, even in the midst of murder and mayhem. Frankly I couldn’t turn the pages fast enough and was desperate to know what happened next, and then what happened after that. From the very first moment, we’re right in the thick of things, with Jim Cutter’s son, Derek, preparing to sneak into the Langleys’ house on the night they’re killed. In a brief prologue, he witnesses the slaughter, but says nothing. For a variety of reasons, not all of which are at once apparent. From that point, the pace and tension never let up. The plot really swoops along nicely and the build up is, as ever, superb. As I would expect from this author. I also enjoyed the way the secrets of the whole Cutter family – Jim, his wife Ellen, and Derek – are slowly revealed through the novel. We are not given all the information at once by Jim (our first-person narrator), and of course some of it he doesn’t know himself. Until later. Much later. Including the fact that his son was present at the Langleys’ deaths.

Jim is a great character and I’m more than happy to spend this novel in his company. He’s a failed (but good) artist who digs people’s gardens and cuts lawns for a living. And why he does that and how he got there is a story in itself. Which Barclay cleverly interweaves with the demands of the main plot, so you never notice the joins. Neither is Jim averse to a bit of sharp violence himself. Here he is dealing with the major’s nasty driver, Lance:

He leaned in close to me from behind, his chin over my shoulder and whispered into my ear, ‘That’s a first. Don’t think I ever opened the door for a fucking lawn boy before.’
I drove my elbow back, fast and hard, taking him just below the ribcage. The air went out of him and he dropped.
‘Sorry,’ I said. ‘That’s my weed-whacking arm. It gets twitchy.’

Jim’s wife, Ellen, I wasn’t so sure of, however – I did find her rather irritating on occasion, but then again, she also is hiding her own secrets which she is too frightened to tell Jim about. So a little bit of odd behaviour here and there is understandable – and yes, Jim does question it. And the explanation at the end is reasonable, I think.

During the story, Jim finds himself and his family mixed up in a series of logical but terrifying situations, all of which test him – and them – to the limit. It may be that, because of this fast pace and the plot demands, then we do lose out on some of the emotional depth of Barclay’s former book – as I’ve already mentioned. But the characters are well described and definitely three-dimensional.

Speaking of characters, I must say how utterly and absolutely I loved Randall Finley, the wicked mayor – and Jim’s bête noire and former boss. I started off seeing him from Jim’s viewpoint and thinking he was a bit of a beast (which of course he undoubtedly is), but then I realised how refreshing, honest to himself and witty he is too, as shown here by Jim:

I’d known long before that my boss was a complete dick. I think that sunk in about an hour or so after he hired me to drive for him, when, stopped at a light, a homeless man approached the major’s window for some change. Finley buzzed down the window and, instead of tossing the guy a quarter, said, ‘Here’s a tip, pal. Buy low, sell high.’

Hateful, naturally, but hell it has style. I changed my opinion entirely: selfish, determined, amoral and absolutely kick-ass, Randall is a total tour de force of writing and even, occasionally, shows a softer side. Only occasionally, thank goodness. Anything more might ruin his street cred. I’m only sorry that the closing moments we share with him aren’t exactly his finest hour. Dammit. Randall deserved a better finish. Definitely. I could happily have read the whole book from his point of view too. And very clever of the author to give us a character that his protagonist doesn’t like (for good and moral reasons) and still make the reader see him in a different way. Fabulous.

That said, I did groan inwardly when I realised Ellen was a key figure in her local literary world and thus that there would be a focus on writers and writing. Yes it does fit in with the plot, but I do wish authors would look at another profession. As I’ve said before. Mind you, I did enjoy this little throwaway comment, from Ellen:

‘Writers, honestly, a lot of them are really nice, but they’re so fucking needy. They need constant attention.’

Well said, my dear! And so true, of course. However, there is a point towards the end of the novel where Jim thinks about the situation involving the bestseller book that’s a mysterious and key part of the plot and says something to himself that I personally believe nobody who isn’t a writer would ever think. Ah, to avoid plot-spoilers, let me put it like this: I’m utterly convinced that only an author might even briefly consider professional writing fraud as a greater trauma than adultery. As Jim isn’t an author, I fear the character consistency falls down at that moment. That’s Barclay speaking, not Jim Cutter. Still, it’s a minor point only, and the completion of the bestseller plotline (and indeed the conclusion of this novel itself) is quietly measured and poignant. Lovely.

So, what can I say? If you like crime novels, this is one of the best. If you like crime novels with good characters, a great plot, a hell of a lot of exciting, edge-of-the-seat action and some quieter thought-provoking moments too, then absolutely don’t miss this. I’m already getting my order in for his next.

Too Close to Home by Linwood Barclay (Orion, 2008), ISBN: 978 0 7528 8862 0)

[Anne thinks it’s best to keep a close watch on the neighbours, at all times. For more information on her voyeuristic activities, and more, please click here.]

About annebrooke

Anne Brooke lives in Surrey, UK, and writes in a variety of genres, including gay erotic romance, fantasy, comedy, thrillers, biblical fiction and the occasional chicklit novel. When not writing, she spends time in the garden attempting to differentiate between flowers and weeds, and in the allotment attempting to grow vegetables. Occasionally, she can also be found in the kitchen making cakes. Every now and again, they are edible. Her websites can be found at: www.annebrooke.com, www.gayreads.co.uk, www.biblicalfiction.co.uk and www.gathandria.com (for fantasy fiction).

11 comments on “Too Close to Home by Linwood Barclay: when Neighbourhood Watch goes terribly, terribly wrong …

  1. JoV
    February 24, 2010

    Hi Anne,

    I’m sold on this. Somebody told me Barclay’s second is not as good as his first. But after reading your review, I think I should give it a shot.

    Great review.

  2. Clare London
    February 24, 2010

    This has really grabbed my attention, I must say. I’ll need another holiday as an excuse to buy another ‘holiday read’ LOL. Great review :).

  3. Christine
    February 24, 2010

    Anne, I love your review. I hadn’t heard of this author, but now I intend to look him up. I need some new plane- and-beach-read material. I’ve been feeling so literary recently! This sounds perfect. And your review, as always, was well worth the time this morning for its entertainment value. Thank you.

  4. Anne Brooke
    February 24, 2010

    Thanks, JoV, Clare & Christine – I can definitely recommend it and glad you enjoyed the review!

    🙂

    Axxx

  5. Jackie
    February 24, 2010

    Why have I not heard of this author? It sounds as if he deserves to be so much better known. It’s not too graphic, is it, when describing the crime? I prefer cozy mysteries, but this one sounds well written as well as suspenseful and I’m tempted, if I can find it in the library. I’m curious how it turns out, too.

  6. annebrooke
    February 25, 2010

    Jackie – I don’t know. I think he’s quietly brilliant. That first novel is also great – emotionally perfect. There is a little more of the crime in Too Close to Home – the son does hear the people get shot though he’s in hiding so he doesn’t see it. Brief moments when he needs to get out of the house afterwards, but it’s very brief. I think this is one you might enjoy.

    🙂

    Axxx

  7. kirstyjane
    February 26, 2010

    Another absolutely fantastic review, Anne. This one’s going on my to read list!

  8. annebrooke
    February 26, 2010

    Thanks, Kirsty! I think Barclay’s a great read – let me know how you get on 🙂

    Axxx

  9. Pingback: Succumb to Temptations « Bibliojunkie

  10. Jackie
    February 27, 2010

    Thanks Anne, for letting me know how it rates on the wimp meter. lol I think I’ll be able to handle this one, so I’ll be checking the library for it.

  11. Anne Brooke
    February 27, 2010

    Hope you enjoy it, Jackie! 🙂 Axxx

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Information

This entry was posted on February 24, 2010 by in Entries by Anne, Fiction, Fiction: 21st Century, Fiction: crime and tagged , , .

Categories

Archive

Editorial Policy

The views expressed in the articles and reviews on Vulpes Libris are those of the authors, and not of Vulpes Libris itself.

Quoting from Vulpes Libris

You are very welcome to quote up to 100 words from any article posted on Vulpes Libris - as long as you quote accurately, give us due credit and link back to the original post. If you would like to quote MORE than 100 words, please ask us first via the email address in the Contact details.

Acknowledgment

  • (The header image is from Aesop's Fables, illustrated by Francis Barlow (1666), and appears courtesy of the Digital and Multimedia Center at the Michigan State University Libraries.)
  • %d bloggers like this: