Vulpes Libris

A collective of bibliophiles talking about books. Book Fox (vulpes libris): small bibliovorous mammal of overactive imagination and uncommonly large bookshop expenses. Habitat: anywhere the rustle of pages can be heard.

In the Name of the Father by Francois Furstenberg

furstenbergArticle by Ken Owen

“The idea that you can merchandise candidates for high office like breakfast cereal is the ultimate indignity to the democratic process.” So argued Adlai Stevenson, when running as the Democratic candidate party for President in 1956. No doubt his viewpoint owed something to his bitterness at being defeated by Dwight Eisenhower in 1952 – a campaign notable for one of the best political adverts ever made. Yet if Stevenson thought that marketing a Presidential candidate was undignified, he showed a gross unawareness of American history. For the careful marketing of presidential candidates was around long before Kellogg’s ever came on the scene.

Francois Furstenberg’s In The Name of the Father shows how early Americans used the life of George Washington in an effort to build a model for good republican citizenship. Washington was the one unimpeachable figure in America in the years after independence; even the extreme partisanship of the 1790s saw Washington’s character emerge largely unscathed, though some of his opponents suspected his support was used for partisan ends. William Maclay, a somewhat irascible Senator from Pennsylvania, summed up the respect in which Washington was held through a back-handed compliment in his diaries. “If there is treason in the wish I retract it, but would to God this same General Washington were in heaven! We would not then have him brought forward as the constant cover to every unconstitutional and irrepublican act.”

For Furstenberg, two texts stand out more than any other in cementing Washington’s role as the Father of the Nation – Washington’s Farewell Address, and Mason Locke Weems’ famous biography of Washington, first published ten years after his death.

The Farewell Address, Washington’s statement announcing his retirement as President, became the key ‘civic text’ of the early nineteenth century. It offered a blueprint to Americans on how to live a republican life, and proved particularly useful during times of national crisis. Sales peaked around the election of 1800, and most spectacularly of all during the war of 1812, when the Address was reprinted more times than when it first appeared in 1796. Its messages, such as those warning of the dangers of partisanship or sectionalism, and emphasising the need for each individual to support the union, became a manifesto that allowed every American to contribute to the success of the nation.

Far outstripping the success of the Farewell Address, though, was Mason Weems’ biography of George Washington. For the historian, the biography is of limited use – because most of it is entirely made up. Devoid of useful information about Washington, Weems instead concentrated on portraying Washington’s personality in the most favourable light.

The young Washington showed his honesty when he confessed to cutting down his father’s cherry tree, for ‘he could not tell a lie’. An anecdote of Washington praying at Valley Forge showed his piety; his refusal to gamble showed his morality. That none of these stories had the slightest foundation did not matter. Weems had struck a wonderful gap in the market. The public were hungry for stories of their most famous countryman; they revelled in his depiction of the perfect citizen. And, as Furstenberg amply shows, the biography became a crucial text in American schooling – teaching the next generation of citizens how to behave.

Of course, Washington had carefully cultivated his public image during his lifetime. In 1783, when many of his army officers hoped to lead a coup installing Washington as leader of America, he refused. Instead, he engaged in high political theatre, dramatically resigning his commission as commander-in-chief before Congress, emphasising the primacy of legislative authority. Retiring to Mount Vernon, he invoked comparisons with the Roman general Cincinnatus, who had reluctantly taken on power, and retired to his farm as soon as he completed his task. His return to national politics, first at the Constitutional Convention and later as the first President, was cast in similar terms – a reluctant patriot taking on high office only because of the insistence of his countrymen.

It is striking just how much these themes have remained constant in portrayals of the American presidency – and how far Presidential candidates will go to portray themselves according to these norms. Washington is not the only President to have been portrayed as a humble farmer who had greatness thrust upon him. Travel writer Jonathan Raban, when travelling through Montana, came upon a disused schoolhouse, where he read tales of the childhoods of Presidents past.

I read stories about… the sickly boyhood of Theodore Roosevelt (‘For years he had to sleep sitting up against some pillows. He could not lie down without coughing’) and the impoverished boyhood of Andrew Jackson (‘But Andrew kept growing in spite of all they said. He clinched his little fists at colic, measles, and whooping cough. He talked very early, and walked instead of crawled…’)

…The America of the schoolbooks was a realm of lonely but invigorating adventure, where poor farm-boys grew up to be President; land of the brave, the true, and the clean, where a beckoning star stood permanently above the western horizon and poverty and ill-health were mere tests of one’s American mettle.

Nevermind that Roosevelt’s childhood was spent in a fancy brownstone in New York City, dining with his parents and conversing in several languages; the image of Roosevelt that sticks with us is of the frontiersman heading to his ranch in North Dakota, acting as ranchman and cow-puncher. For, as Furstenberg wrote of Washington, “veneration of Washington would mold young Americans’ national character, fomenting their attachment to the nation. By urging the emulation of Washington, these sorts of texts were coaxing audiences into becoming not just better people, but better Americans.” For Washington, so too Jackson and Roosevelt.

And so the American public developed idea of the ideal President – the virtues that it would extol more than any other. Even as America has shifted from a rural to an urban nation, those seeking the highest office have shown due deference to its original politics. The Living Room Candidate, an online museum of campaign adverts from 1952 onwards, shows the tropes of Washington lasting into the 21st century. Production values may have increased through the years, but the moral values of the candidates have changed very little.

Dwight Eisenhower is portrayed as the Cincinnatus of the 1950s. ‘Out of the heartland of America’, growing up in a ‘small frame house’ he saves the world on D-Day before returning to ensure America is equipped for the Cold War. Bill Clinton speaks movingly of working his way through law school through part-time jobs turning down big money jobs because ‘all he wanted to do’ was to go back to Arkansas and ‘make a difference’. Al Gore sells himself as a man who went to Vietnam out of duty, with the last thing he is thinking of being entering politics – before realising that was what he needed to do to make things right.

Jimmy Carter is perhaps most instructive of all. “A man whose roots are founded in the American tradition”, Carter released a video biography highlighting his military service, talking about his family who had farmed in Georgia for 200 years, before entering politics as Governor of Georgia, where he looked after the ‘working people’ with an ‘efficient and well-managed government’. Indeed, Carter released ads on all kinds of issues – but invariably from his farm in Georgia. The message was clear. After the great national nightmare of Watergate, a man called to service from his farm was the kind of man America needed.

And it’s a message we’ve seen this year, too. Barack Obama talks of his values coming “straight from the Kansas heartland where I grew up”, just like Eisenhower. He worked his way through college, passing up Wall Street jobs to go to Chicago as a community organiser, just like Bill Clinton. And while Obama might not have been of a generation called to go to war, his adverts place the service of his grandfather and grandmother front and centre.

The abiding slogan of this campaign has been ‘change we can believe in’. Yet if we look back over 220 years of Presidential elections, it is perhaps not change that a presidential candidate needs. Instead, harking back to the age of Washington, they need a biography that Americans can believe in.

Penguin Press HC, 352 pp, ISBN 978-1594200922

5 comments on “In the Name of the Father by Francois Furstenberg

  1. Michael
    November 7, 2008

    Very thought provoking review of an interesting book. The review is fluid and well developed, I like the idea that candidates were merchandised and the discussion about Washington’s biography as a moral guide is striking. It rather reminds me of the old universal histories of antiquity.

    Thank you very much for that, Ken.

  2. rosyb
    November 7, 2008

    Thanks so much for this. I was quite amazed by the video too – which I’ve never seen. I was trying to imagine the equivalent cartoon party political broadcast by the whatever party in the UK today…and failing. It’s not exactly going for gravitas, is it?

    So what is it that Americans find so appealing about this particular story? I am now wondering if there are other patterns to be found in the “stories” about leaders in other countries.

  3. Ken
    November 7, 2008

    RosyB, thanks for the questions. No, it’s not going for gravitas – though if you were to look at other advertisements for Eisenhower, they do show off a more cerebral style (the ad I refer to later features him discussing the readiness of the United States for total war). Partly, I think that’s to do with the different nature of a Presidential election. Even though a President wins a party nomination, the process of an election is selling a man for leadership. The Parliamentary system militates against that somewhat, as we don’t only vote for leaders that we like, but also party ideas in a much more direct way.

    As far as the appeal of the particular story… I’m not sure I can answer that well within a comments section! Furstenberg’s argument, which is certainly persuasive in the early context of Washington, is that in the absence of a useful history, national myth-making fulfilled a need in terms of helping make a community. Establishing Washington as a paragon of virtue, therefore, allowed general or abstract ideas, as expressed in, say, the Declaration of Independence, to take on a more tangible form. (As a side note, it was the potential for the creation of an alternative figurehead to Washington that led Madison to persuade Jefferson to run for the Presidency).

    As to why the story has had particular salience… America’s foundation has always occupied a special place within its national identity. Partly that is to do with myth-making; there is an impression that the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution were universally accepted documents; the popular conception is of a population that united in its love of liberty to overthrow a tyrannous regime – probably the most powerful in the world at the time. Thus the era had a glow about it, especially when looked at from periods of crisis (the other time the Farewell Address had an especially unusual peak in sales was during the Civil War, for example). Within that sense, then, Washington seemed a good model to follow.

    I’m not suggesting that Obama et al are consciously emulating Washington when formulating their biographical adverts. I would suggest, though, that Washington loomed large as a figure of military as well as political virtue, and that is one part of the salience of the story. But I think I’ve probably rambled enough here for one comment…

  4. Jackie
    November 7, 2008

    I wonder if Washington’s story is so ingrained in American’s national consciousness that we don’t always realize when we are harking back to it? This book would certainly be an eye opener for anyone who thought spin was a recent phenomenon. Good review, and timely too. Thanks to Mr. Owen for such an interesting piece.

  5. Moira
    November 8, 2008

    Great article. Thank you.

    I imagine that George Washington – or at least his legend – is a part of most Americans’ mental luggage whether they’re aware of it or not.

    I was very much taken with the Eisenhower advert … which I’d never seen before. It was an interesting approach and not one I’m sure you could get away with today … (more’s the pity).

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s


This entry was posted on November 7, 2008 by in Non-fiction: history and tagged , , , , .



Editorial Policy

The views expressed in the articles and reviews on Vulpes Libris are those of the authors, and not of Vulpes Libris itself.

Quoting from Vulpes Libris

You are very welcome to quote up to 100 words from any article posted on Vulpes Libris - as long as you quote accurately, give us due credit and link back to the original post. If you would like to quote MORE than 100 words, please ask us first via the email address in the Contact details.


  • (The header image is from Aesop's Fables, illustrated by Francis Barlow (1666), and appears courtesy of the Digital and Multimedia Center at the Michigan State University Libraries.)
  • %d bloggers like this: