Belonging by Ron Butlin
April 14, 2008 by Lisa
Part of Scottish Literature week.
Belonging by Ron Butlin is an intense and challenging novel about Jack, a Scotsman who’s stuck in a life that he seems to have drifted upon.
At the start of the novel Jack and his girlfriend, Anna, are working in the French Alps, where they are spending the winter season as handyman and housekeeper of an exclusive apartment block. The apartments are empty and life is one long champagne Jacuzzi until Thérèse, a girl with “firework hair” appears on the scene.
At first it seems that Thérèse is everything that Anna is not: chic, exotic, uncomplicated, a teenager:
…the girl seemed a good bit younger: chestnut hair streaked blue, orange and green, long leather coat and Doc Martens. Sexy looking too. Firework hair and Gucci luggage - that was my first sight of Thérèse.
Thérèse is accompanied by an older, Ferrari-driving man - her father, Jack hopes, but whose “unfatherly” demeanour soon quashes that hope. Jack lies to Anna about even seeing the girl, as he fears she’ll subject him to a psychobabble lecture about his subconscious fancying every woman who crosses his path. Within a few hours Jack is called by Thérèse to her apartment, where he finds Thérèse sobbing over Monsieur Ferrari’s corpse. Accidental death or murder? When the police arrive, despite the rumpled sheets and the ‘atmosphere of illicit sex’ there is some suggestion that the man might be Thérèse’s father, after all…
Anna is an unsympathetic portrayal of a needy woman. Ever gallant, Jack dumps her by pretending he’s seen someone he knows, walking off their train and leaving her to return to Edinburgh alone. Inevitably, Jack shacks up with Thérèse, a seemingly less complex (although an equally disturbed) woman. After mooching around Paris for a while, they go for a hideously awkward visit to Thérèse’s mother and soon afterwards leave for a tiny hippy commune in the Spanish wilderness.
One might say this is a novel of symbolism then. Jack’s two women are fire and ice. Anna is Scottish, fair-skinned, blue-eyed, disturbed - emotionally she is as fiercely chilly as the alpine tempest which kick-starts the novel. Thérèse is French, dark-eyed and fiery as the sun that beats down relentlessly on the hippy commune.
The representations of women here are not exactly charming, as we see these loony women through Jack’s eyes, and the reader might ask, what judge is he? He’s a twenty-nine-year-old baby, a drifter who goes along with things until he decides he’s had enough and then walks away with hardly a glance over his shoulder. As a study of the kind of man I’ve always avoided, I found him (and his view of women) interesting - at times he exhibits a kind of bewildered misogyny, but he’s not overtly mental either. He’s your average Joe, plus a wibbly spine and a chip on his shoulder.
The novel is bleak, disturbing, violent, and yet the imagery is singularly beautiful. Beautiful but dangerous - just like the women, one might say. The prose itself is a bit like that, often gorgeous enough to stop me in my tracks, it also has an eerie and unsettling quality.
Apart from extremes of landscape and temperature, there are extremes of socioeconomics, from the lavish French apartments to rural Spanish life in a flea-bitten, mosquito-ridden shack. The imagery is more vivid because of these contrasts and at times I felt as if the settings were imprinted onto my retinas.
Sexuality and violence go hand in hand in Belonging, and there is a troubling rape scene, which is slightly ambiguous, as if the author was not sure if he wanted our Jack as a fully-fledged rapist. As soon as the ‘victim’ is entered, she decides she wants sex.
Bitch! You fucking bitch!
She caught her breath.
I tugged again.
She cried out. I clamped my hand over her mouth.
That’s when I realised I was getting hard and, for the first time in weeks, felt charged and really alive…
A few moments later, we hear:
I had just entered her when between half-sobs, she managed a breathless whisper: ‘Yes, Jack…Yes… Take me, take me… TAKE ME!’
I was unsure about this scene and wasn’t convinced of Thérèse’s instant acquiescence, and I’m sure there is a reading whereby Thérèse does not welcome Jack’s advances at all. Perhaps there is a bit of Tess and Alec in this scene.
The only part of the novel I skimmed was a gruesome scene in which a pregnant snake looking for somewhere to lay her eggs, is hacked to pieces by Jack. Those few pages made me feel physically queasy, so I’m afraid I couldn’t read them properly.
I might not have done Belonging justice here. I found it disturbing but thought-provoking and impressive. The writing is brave, accomplished and full of tension. One has the sense that this book has been polished extensively, every sentence considered and reconsidered over a long period of time. There is nothing haphazard in the writing, it is measured and controlled, leaving the reader to feel that they are in the hands of an unusually gifted writer.
Ron Butlin is an Edinburgh novelist and Belonging is his third novel since 1987. Irvine Welsh hailed Butlin’s first novel, The Sound of My Voice, as “one of the greatest pieces of fiction to come out of Britain in the 80s”.
Belonging is reviewed on ReadySteadyBook here.
In The Guardian here. The Scarborough Evening News here.
Robmack blogspot here.
Belonging is published by Serpent’s Tail. ISBN-13: 978-1852429157. 256 pages.
The Rest of Scottish Literature Week:
Reviews
Maggie Haggith’s “The Last Bear”
J.A. Henderson’s “Crash”
Alan Warner’s “Morvern Callar”
Interview: Doug Johnstone, author of “Tombstoning” and “The Ossians”



This book sounds like it is both disturbing but maybe putting its fingers on some uncomfortable areas. I am quite curious about it.
“Anna is an unsympathetic portrayal of a needy woman…The representations of women here are not exactly charming, as we see these loony women through Jack’s eyes, and the reader might ask, what judge is he? He’s a twenty-nine-year-old baby, a drifter who goes along with things until he decides he’s had enough and then walks away with hardly a glance over his shoulder. As a study of the kind of man I’ve always avoided, I found him (and his view of women) interesting - at times he exhibits a kind of bewildered misogyny, but he’s not overtly mental either. He’s your average Joe, plus a wibbly spine and a chip on his shoulder.”
This sounded interesting - I think an unsympathetic depiction of a needy woman sounds a brave move.
But sounds like you are not sure whether this book veers too far in its exploration of iffy territory or not. Is it a portrait of a man we are asked to identify with/question/both/neither?
I am curious about Anna - why is she so complex?
“Is it a portrait of a man we are asked to identify with/question/both/neither?”
Good question. At first I thought we were being asked to identify with Jack but there comes a point when you think, err, are we? Is this about the women being destructive and unstable, or is this about Jack being those things? It was very cleverly done. It’s one of those novels which stays with you and makes you think, long after you’ve finished the book. I read this one about six weeks ago and it’s still vivid in my mind.
Anna is manipulative and wants to start a family with Jack. The more he resists, the more manipulative she becomes. She’s also violent and pushes people to extremes in mad moments. The next day she continues as if nothing untoward has happened, and these cycles seem to be of Anna’s making, with Jack just along for the ride, unable to rid himself of her, or make her happy. But Jack is a participant in their mad power struggles, although he doesn’t seem to see that. It is interesting. The first person narrator works really well here.
Going back to the first point, if I had thought we were supposed to constantly sympathise with Jack, I wouldn’t be comfortable at all. I don’t think it does ask that. Jack’s telling of his tale reveals all those things about him that he doesn’t want to reveal. Give him enough rope, etc.
It sounds as though none of the characters in this novel are very sympathetic. Does it make the novel any less enjoyable? We’ve had this discussion before about the need or not for characters to be sympathetic, not in the sense of being ‘nice’ but in the sense of being understandable and likeable in a ‘warts and all’ sort of way.
The snake bit made me feel a bit sick and that was just your reference to it.
Very impactful cover. Who do you think it’s supposed to be?
Ever gallant, Jack dumps her by pretending he’s seen someone he knows, walking off their train[...]
Made me laugh! Great review.
The rape scene (if it was that) put me in mind of the rape scene (if it was that) in Coetzee’s Disgrace: ‘Not rape, not quite that, but undesired nevertheless, undesired to the core.’ Such hard writing in the face of it, no, ‘Take me, take me!’ etcetera.
Think I’ll give the book a miss, though. I’m no fan of Irvine Welsh, so if he likes him then it’s odds on I won’t. And, for some reason I can’t work out, I’ve gone off first person narrators lately. Weird.
I did enjoy the novel because I was so *interested* in the characters, even though they weren’t particularly likeable.
The snake bit was something else. It actually turned my stomach and made me want to retch. Like I say, vivid writing!
The cover is definitely striking. The OH is quite freaked out by it. I suppose it’s the “being watched” element which makes it unnerving. The eye has an amazing look about it - sort of sexy/hostile/intense, so a bit like the book then. The first time I saw it I assumed it was some ‘envy/green-eyed monster’ reference, and there’s certainly plenty of that in the book too.
Really strong writing. Feels like it’s the sort of novel that will become a classic.
Crossed with Sam.
“The rape scene (if it was that) put me in mind of the rape scene (if it was that) in Coetzee’s Disgrace: ‘Not rape, not quite that, but undesired nevertheless, undesired to the core.’”
Really interesting. Must investigate.
I was thinking earlier that this might be one that you’d like, Sam.
P.S It wasn’t like Welsh’s writing (the little that I’ve read, anyway). I was rather surprised at Welsh championing Butlin like that.
In the hyperlink above on “Ron Butlin” to the BBC page, it says the following, which I find quite amazing:
Butlin sounds a bit like Houellebecq, now I think about it. The terse language, preoccupation with violent sex. Read him? Any comparison?
Okay, I’ll seek it out next time I’m in a bookshop (er, that’ll be tomorrow during my lunchbreak, then).
Definitely read the Coetzee. It’s compulsive!
“Butlin sounds a bit like Houellebecq… Read him?” Ah, seem to have been avoiding Houellebecq since some snotty journo said that all new writers are trying to sound like him. Will look in the library. For the Coetzee too. I think you’ll be able to tell if Belonging is your sort of thing, just from the first chapter. Try before you buy…
Why is it the fashion these days for male authors to make the female become turned on by rape? Follett does it in his new one too. I’m sure a call to any rape crisis center would tell them that idea is so far from fact to be absurd. Is it because the authors insist that rape is a crime of passion, rather than power? Is it to make the male less criminal, less creepy, less responsible for perpetuating violence against women? The attitude these authors display is actually one of the excuses and viewpoints rapists use to justify their actions. For authors to encourage this idea is blindly irresponsible.
Between that action and the killing of the snake, Jack sounds like an icky person. This is one book I’ll not be looking for.
Jackie, it also crossed my mind that this might not be your kind of book…
I’ve been thinking about the snake. The symbolic snake, perhaps. Thinking about snakes and women: the biblical snake in the Garden of Eden, the snakes in the hair of Medusa and her sisters, etc.
This big snake lives in the commune’s woodpile and when Jack first asks about Ms Snake, he’s told she’s harmless. However, the other male resident comes to Jack several months later with an axe and a shovel…
The snake is pregnant and this is when she’s dangerous. She wants to move into their ricketty shack to lay her eggs, so she’s got to go (apparently). Jack is a bit shocked at this, but once they find her and get stuck in, Jack loses his head and in a foaming mess of blood and guts and egg (Jack like a maniac) the snake leaves this world for a better one (Snake Heaven, one hopes). The other guy actually has to intervene and stop Jack hacking at the fragmented remains of a very dead she-snake. Vomit.
So if Ms Snake represents Belonging’s women, they’re dangerous when they want to settle down or when they get broody/pregnant/maternal and that’s when Jack loses his head. Maybe. And maybe Jack is supposedly a symbol of a certain kind of (misogynist) man.
I don’t think this book is flying the flag for misogyny, FWIW. Just looking at it and trying to work it out. That’s how I read it anyway.
Now, I must forget the snake scene before I throw up my tea.
Another one I don’t want to read. The world seems to be full of them.
[...] Ron Butlin’s “Belonging” Maggie Haggith’s “The Last Bear” Jan Andrew Henderson’s “Crash” [...]
[...] Comments Movern Callar by Ala… on Belonging by Ron ButlinLuisa on Movern Callar by Alan War…Lisa on Where the wild [...]
[...] Ron Butlin’s “Belonging” Jan Andrew Henderson’s “Crash” Alan Warner’s “Morvern Callar” [...]
[...] darkness in The Ossians reminded me of Ron Butlin’s Belonging - though the subject matter is different, the poetic descriptions, the postmodern [...]
Good news for Ron Butlin:
http://news.scotsman.com/entertainment/Awardwinning-writer-takes-up-role.4206522.jp