A good friend of mine lent me this book, saying he thought it was a bit ‘Jennish’. I trust his opinions and so I read it right away, letting it push its way to the front of my always growing beside-brown-reading-chair pile. I finished it during a day I spent in bed recovering from a little bump in the car, and as soon as I’d reached the end, I turned back to the chapters I liked the best and read them again. It’s not often I do that; there are always so many other books waiting for me.
By ‘Jennish’, I suppose he meant dark: it’s about a strange, too-perfect career couple, a couple so wrapped up in each other that anything else is an unwanted intrusion. Told in the voices of Brandon and Sherilyn’s neighbours, families and work colleagues, the novel narrates what happens when a couple who only need each other are faced with the arrival of a child. It won’t be giving away too much of the plot to say the later chapters of the book, narrating the consequences of their unwanted arrival, are narrated by police officers, social workers, judge, juror and prison officers.
Some of the voices in the novel stood out: Charlotte, the nosy neighbour who calls in the NSPC because she doesn’t see little Samantha playing in her parents’ perfectly landscaped, not-suitable-for-children garden. Xandra, the prison officer who sees more of Sherilyn than she understands, and Alun, the police officer who is the first to discover how Sherilyn and Brandon solved the problem of Samantha, in an abandoned, locked room in the back of their Homes and Gardens, picture perfect house.
From Charlotte’s first chapter, where she talks about the icily polite couple who move into the street and describes the early childhood of their almost invisible daughter, there is a sense of pace and suspense that continues until the second third of the book, when Alun describes exactly what happened to Samantha. This is the ‘Jennish’ part, I suppose – something dark and gory and frightening nestled in a middle class suburb. But it’s over and done with before we’re half-way through.
I made a vow to myself that I wouldn’t go on the internet and talk crap about other people’s writing, because writing is hard, and if I didn’t like a book I would just keep my mouth shut. And I also think people who talk crap about other people are mainly trying to big themselves up in some way. So the next bit is a reluctant bit.
Mainly I read as a writer, paying attention to the way the thing is put together, and the structure of this one – short chapters told in many different voices, jigsawing together as a whole, didn’t stand up to scrutiny.
The second third of the novel lulls, and is filled with the uninteresting and often clichéd family background of the pair, narrated by their stereotypically working-class families. This section works backwards and destroys the pace of the novel. The back-story contains more ‘issues’ than Brookside, and describe dead mothers, sexual abuse, alcoholic step-mothers, domestic violence and self-harm. The book jacket promises ‘indescribable nightmare’ and yet Topolski clutters the narrative with exposition we could have done without. With such profusion of misery, clarity and plausibility is sacrificed. Perhaps this is a matter of taste: I like an economical book. Or perhaps it is because Topolski is a psychotherapist when she’s not writing and the demands of her profession have led her to psychoanalyse her protagonists and give us potted case histories that we did not need.
Topolski also missed the chance to take advantage of the ironic potential the structure of her novel allowed. With a chorus of voices at her disposal I would have expected conflicting viewpoints, unreliability and ambiguity but Topolski’s narrators are as unanimous in their verdicts as her jury: the word ‘monster’ occurs in every chapter – a dismissive repetition that denies us the chance to dwell on Brandon and Sherilyn’s own chilling estimation of events.
Still, the novel picks up its narrative again and recovers slightly in the last third, when the plot finally moves forward with accounts of the couple’s trial and time in remand. Even so, as we know from very early on in the novel that the couple are found guilty of their crime there is little suspense and even less character development. Sherilyn and Brandon speak in their own voices of their telepathic connection and their simultaneous masturbatory fantasies but their final ending is as implausible and predictable as their stilted, show-home voices.
I’m going to give this book a six out of ten. Which means I am glad I read it and I mainly enjoyed it and even the bits I didn’t like made me think a bit more about how to put books together and how interesting ideas and good writing can be let down by a poor handling of structure. But when Topolski brings out a new one I will still probably get it out from the library and give it a try.
Monster Love by Carol Topolski. Fig Tree. 272 pages. Hardcover £16.99.
ISBN10 : 1905490267 ISBN13 : 978-1905490264


Well I thought the way this review teased out the positive and the negative aspects made it seem like it engaged with the book which made it an interesting read to me. I actually felt quite curious about the book and how it handled the aspects you mention.
“I made a vow to myself that I wouldn’t go on the internet and talk crap about other people’s writing, because writing is hard, and if I didn’t like a book I would just keep my mouth shut. And I also think people who talk crap about other people are mainly trying to big themselves up in some way. So the next bit is a reluctant bit.”
It’s tricky and Lisa put together a great post about some of these issues here: http://vulpeslibris.wordpress.com/2008/02/07/feature-fox-in-the-city/
I sometimes worry that the bookblogs (including our own lovely Vulpes) has a tendency to veer unbalancedly (?) towards the positive, which is not necessarily representative of reading or books. I think this is partly inevitable because on blogs people tend to read, finish and review books that suit their taste anyway. But there also seems to be a general squeamishness in the bookblogging world about being critical. I truly think it is important to be able to be critical on bookblogs or else the venture seems pointless (to me). I read blogs to see if I might like something. I don’t want just recommendations, I want engagement with the book and to be allowed to make up my mind whether it sounds like something I might be interested in.
Critical and engaging with what does and what doesn’t work (as you have done) or even with what isn’t very good doesn’t necessarily mean something needs to be sneery or condescending.
(Although I think that can be refreshing on a classic that can’t be harmed by a bit of spleen-venting.)
I also wonder if it is the bloggers who are also writers who are most sensitive about this whole issue. Why shouldn’t the general public say whatever they want about whatever is in the culture? This cutting down of debate really depresses me both as a reader, writer and just as a normal person. Isn’t it what books and art and all things culture should be about – provoking opinion, feeling or discussion?
Err….sorry, seem to have gone off on a different subject now.
Interesting review though.
Thought-provoking.
Thanks for that – and for making the distinction between a review and a recommendation. I think I’d been half thinking about that myself but you put it into better words for me.
I agree, once anything is in the public domain people have the right to comment on it, and perhaps I am over sensitive because one day I might be in the position of getting reviewed myself.
The crap-talkers I mentioned were mainly a bunch of Amazon reviewers who seemed to like the sound of their own voices rattling more than anything else. It put me off for a while, and I blogged about it here:
http://jennashworth.blogspot.com/2008/03/i-just-finished-writing-review-for.html
I think the way I have squared it with myself is to keep in mind that a real person wrote a book and didn’t make me read it. To not say anything I wouldn’t feel right saying to that person’s face. LIke you say, you can engage with a piece of writing on its own terms and talk about your experience of reading it, your judgement on the extent to which you feel it achieved its aims, without getting shrieky.
Maybe I’ll be okay slating some classics written by long dead authors, if I ever get around to reading any of them.
I’ll read that. Amazon reviews so often seem to be totally euphoric! I end up looking for all the four stars or one with mostly good but a couple of negatives that are the kind of negatives that I might actually think good myself.
The other debate is about whether small publisher books can be reviewed negatively. Fictionbitch wrote very interesting about why she, as a writer, wants reviews positive or negative and does not want to be not reviewed just because with a small publisher or whatever. http://fictionbitch.blogspot.com/2008/02/positive-reviewing-cultural-error.html
I think the idea of being part of the cultural debate and not just discounted or not talked about is really quite key…But obviously we all have own different takes on this issue. But for what it’s worth that’s mine – for the moment anyway – LOL!
I was very interested in reading this review – Carol Topolski is a close friend of mine and I’ll definitely draw her attention to it. I can disclose that she’s writing her second novel at the moment and if dark and grisly’s what you like, dark and grisly’s what you’ll get.
I agree as a published author (20 books and the 21st to come – no novels but other kinds of fiction and also screenplays) that bad reviews are better than no reviews, tho’ I’ve been lucky. And it was great fun having one of my books ripped to shreds in a very colourful act of destruction by Julie Burchill. But, you know what? The book stayed on the fast-table at most bookshops and is still selling 10 years on!
What people have said above is right – what any reader of reviews wants (including the author of the book in question) is engagement. A review that essentially purloins the words of the blurb on the fly-leaf makes very disappointing reading. And we authors (or most of us anyway) are as human and as insecure about our work as the next person, so it’s great to learn what actual readers (our real consitutuency) think rather than hardened critics.
Finally, when I hand a piece of writing to someone for feedback I definitely do NOt want a ‘yeah that was great. I liked it’, response. I want to know what you liked and what you didn’t like. I want you to help me make it better because you’re the one I’m writing for (even tho’ I don’t always know it at the time.) On the other hand it wouldn’t help to have you tell me ‘hated it mate. Bin it.’ These are emotional and emotive responses which don’t help. So, please, do criticise but make it as factual and constructive as you can. As indeed Jenn has done. You’re right, Jenn, it is hard and very scary to put that offering out into the world but we published writers need to know where we can improve. And it’s a wonderful feeling to think that the reader has done more than skim the words, that they’ve got absorbed and given some time to reflecting on the content or make-up of the book into which I have invested so much more than time and skill.
So keep it coming guys -
http://www.ShahrukhHusain.com
http://www.NarrativesOnline.com
Great review, Jenn.
This looks like an interesting one. I’ve been particularly impressed to discover that it’s Topolski’s first novel, written a little later in life. Shall definitely be looking out for it…
Trilby – yes, it is her first published novel, but she mentions in an afterword/acknowledgement page at the end that she wrote a different one during her time at UEA, and had to postpone writing this one (the idea came to her during the course, while she was working on the first) until she had finished. I’m always interested in writers who have real jobs and other lives too – I can’t imaging doing nothing other than writing myself.
Shah – thanks for your comments on this. It’s interesting to know what it is like from the other side of the fence, and that bad reviews don’t always kill a book’s chances of being commercially successful. Your comments about constructive and critical responses was interesting – I can engage with a book using my critical faculties and I’m more or less comfortable giving critical feedback like this – as I have tried to do with my comments on how the structure of Monster Love worked for me. But emotionally? I try to personalise my reviews, to make them as emotional as possible. We read to be moved in some way, or another, don’t we? I don’t think it is as easy to separate the two experiences of reading as you may have been suggesting, and my ’style’ of reviewing will always include a very emotional, personal response to the text as well as anything else constructive/critical I might want to say about it.
So personally, I really, really liked the ideas behind this book. I like dark and grisly work and I like crime/thriller/psychological novels where the issues aren’t cut and dried – where the ‘villain’ gets to at least try to convince the reader into seeing the logic of their actions. I thought there was a lot of that in this novel, but it was let down by the structure, which didn’t work as well as it might have.
I was intrigued enough by the cover and synopsis – very Patricia Highsmith – to buy this, but ended up giving up halfway through, so didn’t review it because I hadn’t finished it. But I agree with Jenn’s comments on the structure, and for me the book’s strength was in the voices narrating, which were much more interesting than Brendan and Sherilyn, particularly when they revealed more about their narrator than their ostensible subject.
But this was also the weakness: the plot is effectively told in Charlotte’s opening narrative, and I was expecting some surprises – maybe they didn’t really do it? – but didn’t get any (I did skim through the rest of the book after giving up). I also hoped for a bit of unreliability in the narratives of the surrounding players, but there didn’t seem to be any. Then there was some striking implausibility or at least too sudden developments, such as Sherilyn’s mother’s narrative, where she goes from loving mum to locked-up loony and back again in the space of five pages. Sherilyn and Brendan dictate their own account of what terrible things they did matter-of-factly, which is fine if the book is an account of psychopathic personalities (as an interview I read with Topolski in the Telegraph seemed to suggest); but if they’re ‘just’ innate psychopaths with personality disorder, why give us all their background and upbringing as though this explains their behaviour?
Maybe my expectations were all wrong, but I ended up terribly disappointed, though a more detailed reading of the second half may well have changed that…
Why didn’t this couple invest in birth control if there was no room for a child in their relationship? That would seem to be common sense. I think this book would be way too disturbing for me to read.
Like Jenn, I’ve noticed the narrative structure can completely ruin a good premise. Why isn’t that caught more often by editors before publishing?
Very interesting review Jenn. What is also interesting is that Monster Love is longlisted for this years Orange Prize.
The full list is in The Guardian today.
http://books.guardian.co.uk/orange2008/story/0,,2266167,00.html?gusrc=rss&feed=10
Congratulations to Carol
This one’s definitely on my list to read. Interesting review, Jenn. The book sounds quite Lisa-ish too, methinks
Must say I don’t love the cover though.
Congratulations to Carol from me too!
That’s funny, I love that cover. First thing I thought was “ooo, I like that”. Very retro and arty isn’t it?
I can see it’s kinda plain for some purposes mind.
Reminds me of our old settee. Shudders at the memory.
Interesting review and discussion. Thanks folks.
Nik
I’m reading this book at the moment and am very intrigued by it. It’s cleverly written and different from the norm. But I’ve come across the most amazing booboo and I cannot believe she didn’t get her facts straight on this:
“He arranged them on his table in the exact position of the pyramids in the Valley of the Kings”
“I took it when we were in Egypt, in the Valley of the Kings….she was standing next to one pyramid, with two others in the background”
If she’d bothered to read up about the place she describes she’d have found that there are no pyramids in the Valley of the Kings. They’re in Giza near Cairo, hundreds of miles away!
I picked this book up in a used book store last weekend. (Since some people commented on the cover, I will add that I was actually quite drawn to the cover and read the first page or so right in the store.) I searched for reviews online because I was really curious about what others had to say about this book. My reading experience really left me wondering, “What does Topolski want me to do with this?” and so I thought I would see what others were doing with it to help me! Jenn, I really liked your review and I think that you “hit the nail right on the head.” Thank-you for sharing!